#1 Timothy Schoechle PhD

Re-Inventing Wires – The Future of Landlines and Networks. This paper by Timothy Schoechle (PhD) from the National Institute for Science, Law and Public Policy “provides a beacon of light, a reasonable voice for our turbulent world.

Raises the Top 4 issues:

1. Your community, loss of local control of public right of way: This gives telecom corporations a ‘grants by-right’  This could be the reason why when recently writing to councillors they are telling us that they are no the decision makers.
2. Surveillance and control Privacy: corporate and government.  Cellular wireless devices are designed to; monitor, trace, surveillance, behaviour modification.  ONLY 1% of WIFI consumption is useful to us.  The other 99% is extraneous to our uses, and feeds the categories above for advertising and monetary purposes.  What that boils down to, is that we are killing the planet for advertising!  5G is a business model, morphed over the last 20 years, in trading personal data. Adopted by entire industries. Now all business models have morphed as telecommunications have morphed on this push for advertising. Driven through data modification.
3. Your public health and safety: Concerns around microwave and milometer wave radiation. Both have demonstrated risks to birds, bees, insects, animals, plants, trees and present as a cancer risk. There is massive volumes of evidence.  
4. Your energy supply and climate:  Wireless technologies consume ten times the amount of energy as of wired.  Wireless technologies consume 51% of total global consumption. Only 1% is useful, with 99% going to advertising and surveillance.  This is not a sustainable model.  Fibre technologies are efficient by a factor of 10.   Wireless is all about money, advertising and surveillance not the health of the planet and population health.  5G is purely a marketing tool, advertising movies.  And these companies are NOT about to back off now, millions have gone into this. 

#2 Lawyer Christian F. Jensen present the Legal Opinion on 5G – Legal team

It is the conclusion of this legal opinion that establishing and activating a 5G-network, as it is currently described, would be in contravention of current human and environmental laws enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, EU regulations, and the Bern- and Bonn-conventions.

The reason is the very significant body of scientific documentation available, showing that radiofrequent electromagnetic radiation is harmful and dangerous to the health of humans (particularly children), animals and plants. This also applies when the radiation remains within the limits recommended by ICNIRP and currently used in Denmark as well as broadly within the EU

Raises issues:

1. Summarises risks to humans and the environment: LINK TO VIDEOS: https://www.helbredssikker-telekommunikation.dk/nyheder/legalopinion5G
2. Focus on the concerns around ICNIRPs closed group: Formed by a closed community of hand-picked successors.  All applications into this group are denied.  
3. Focus on conflicting information with 252 independent scientists: A group of independent scientists from 43 countries have publications contradictory to the opinion of the closed group.  All global decisions on the safety of 5G stem from ICNIRP.   Contradictions and concerns include structural and functional changes to life on many levels, to include genetic damages.  
4. Siting Dr Martin Pall’s 127 page study with over 100 citations warning of the danger of 5G:  MARTIN PALL’S 127 PAGE Document link HERE.   Wireless technologies consume ten times the amount of energy as of wired.  Wireless technologies consume 51% of total global consumption. Only 1% is useful, with 99% going to advertising and surveillance.  This is not a sustainable model.  Fibre technologies are efficient by a factor of 10.   Wireless is all about money, advertising and surveillance not the health of the planet and population health.  5G is purely a marketing tool, advertising movies.  And these companies are NOT about to back off now, millions have gone into this. 
5. Siting the Summary of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child: Article 24: Health and health services; The child has the right to the enjoyment of the highest possible standard of health and to have access to healthcare and medical services. In its provision of health services, the State shall place special emphasis on primary and preventative health care and public health education.
6. Siting The Human Right’s Act Right To Life: Article 2: Right to life Human Rights Act :This means that nobody, including the Government, can try to end your life. It also means the Government should take appropriate measures to safeguard life by making laws to protect you and, in some circumstances, by taking steps to protect you if your life is at risk.  Public authorities should also consider your right to life when making decisions that might put you in danger or that affect your life expectancy.  If a member of your family dies in circumstances that involve the state, you may have the right to an investigation. Article 8: Respect for your private and family life: Article 8 protects your right to respect for your private life, your family life, your home and your correspondence (letters, telephone calls and emails, for example).  Full length article link
7. Focus on predictable avoidable deaths and Duty Of Care: When authorities remain passive, they are then liable. All local authorities have a duty of care.  When authorities do not act upon known risks they break Article 2.   

#3 Elizabeth Kelly – Appeal Director #EMFscientist.org

The International EMF Scientist Appeal serves as a credible and influential voice from EMF (electromagnetic field) scientists who are urgently calling upon the United Nations and its sub-organisations, the WHO and UNEP, and all U.N. Member States, for greater health protection on EMF exposure.

1. International Scientist Appeal on Electromagnetic Fields: Martin Blank, PhD Spokesperson: WATCH APPEAL VIDEO NOW

2. We are all part of the largest biological experiment without our INFORMED consent: Scientists express concerns about the wireless infrastructure.  Studies show that damage goes well beyond the human race and is dangerous at levels lower than what are deemed safe.  We all have a responsibility and duty of care toward our children, and pregnant women and their unborn child, as they are the most vulnerable sector and will be affected the greatest.  
3. Sign the appeal: We invite all EMF scientists to conduct independent studies and publications.  To then sign this appeal. 

#3 Katie Singer – Writer and Educator: Katie’s book; An Electronic Silent Spring; Facing the Dangers and Creating Safe Limits 

Over millions of years, living creatures have evolved in relation to the Earth’s electromagnetic energy. Now, we’re surrounded by human-made frequencies that challenge our health and survival. An Electric Silent Spring reports the effects of electrification and wireless devices on people, plants, bee colonies, and frogs around the globe. It presents solutions for people who want to reduce their exposure to electromagnetic radiation. This pioneering book is for anyone concerned about the health of the environment and the people and other creatures that inhabit it.

Katie warns us of the extensive collateral damage that we are doing to our earth and each other, when choosing to engage in wireless technologies.  Looking behind the scenes: 

1. Predictions have been made by Huawei: 51% of total electrical use will go to I.C.T.  This is a staggering figure! 

2. Every 1 x Smartphone includes more than 1000 substances; Each substance has its own carbon footprint. 
3. Cradle to Grave energy; a breakdown of consumption: Robotics are involved, extraction of raw materials; ore and minerals. Transportation, followed by the refining process.  Assembly plants are involved to clean the circuit boards.  The items are then boxed and shipped. When the item is no longer useful: a process to deconstruct and re-use raw material.  
4. Daily energy consumption: 81% of energy is used by a laptop before we even turn it on.  Reference to aforementioned data gathering and surveillance.  
5. Jevons Paradox: The Jevons paradox is perhaps the most widely known paradox in environmental economics: states the more efficient a technology is, with greater efficiency, the higher the carbon footprint it required in its making. Energy efficiency ‘verses’ energy demand in the making of the item. 
6. We need to FOCUS on the REDUCTION of the total use of energy – demand:  99% extraneous, with advertising and data collection driving this.
7. Raw materials are mined under abusive circumstances 
8. We have a collective responsibility to get informed around the 1000 substances, which are mined under abusive circumstances: Lots of water goes into the cleaning of ores and minerals.  Lithium from South America takes 18 months of evaporation to make lithium usable.  Chemicals are also involved in this process.  The chemical HCL involved has a downstream consequence impacting fish and other marine life. Copper and coltan are connected to abuse of the worst kind. There is more murder associated with them than WW2
9. Silica: This is required to create a conductor and transmitter.  Made from Quartz + Carbon + Wood. Even when silica is refined to 98% pure it is not good enough for electronic grade silicon. 
10. Advised, that we wait at least 4 years before upgrading our devices: However children will break their devices in order to get a newer upgraded model.  Parents are advised to not fall victim to this.
11. Warnings from the European Environmental Agency: Late lessons from early warnings. There are many similarities to historical events and warnings, when applying these events to foresight. Historically 27 studies were ignored, to great peril. 
12. Huberous-Hype: Marketing hype is wide spread.  A key feature of Huberous-hype is that real questions are not actually addressed leading to a failure to independently scrutinise. Simultaneously benefits are over-emphasised, and the real-actual costs are under-stated. 
13. Development of new technologies ties in with the early closing down of all competing older technologies. 
14. Huge failure of independent studies
15. Huge failure of acknowledged issues
16. Policy makers do not appreciate the high strength of evidence needed to reasonably ascertain a balance of probabilities
17. Failure to act on early warning: Scientists who produce early warnings are harassed for producing inconvenient truths.